Hand Tool Definitions

Having worked many years as an mechanical engineer in a large equipment machine shop, learned that much of this is exactly right.

DRILL PRESS: A tall upright machine useful for suddenly snatching flat metal bar stock out of your hands so that it smacks you in the chest and flings your beer across the room, denting the freshly-painted part which you had carefully set in the corner where nothing could get to it.
WIRE WHEEL: Cleans paint off bolts and then throws them somewhere under the workbench with the speed of light. Also removes fingerprints and hard-earned calluses from fingers in about the time it takes you to say, ''What the...??''
ELECTRIC HAND DRILL: Normally used for spinning pop rivets in their holes until you die of old age.
SKILL SAW: A portable cutting tool used to make studs too short.
PLIERS: Used to round off bolt heads. Sometimes used in the creation of blood blisters.
BELT SANDER: An electric sanding tool commonly used to convert minor touch-up jobs into major refinishing jobs.
HACKSAW: One of a family of cutting tools built on the Ouija board principle. It transforms human energy into a crooked, unpredictable motion, and the more you attempt to influence its course, the more dismal your
future becomes.
VISE-GRIPS: Generally used after pliers to completely round off bolt heads. If nothing else is available, they can also be used to transfer intense welding heat to the palm of your hand.
WELDING GLOVES: Heavy duty leather gloves used to prolong the conduction of intense welding heat to the palm of your hand.
OXYACETYLENE TORCH: Used almost entirely for lighting various flammable objects in your shop on fire. Also handy for igniting the grease inside the wheel hub you want the bearing race out of.
TABLE SAW: A large stationary power tool commonly used to launch wood projectiles for testing wall integrity.
HYDRAULIC FLOOR JACK: Used for lowering an automobile to the ground after you have installed your new brake shoes, trapping the jack handle firmly under the bumper.
EIGHT-FOOT LONG YELLOW PINE 2X4: Used for levering an automobile upward off of a trapped hydraulic jack handle.
E-Z OUT BOLT AND STUD EXTRACTOR: A tool ten times harder than any known drill bit that snaps neatly off in bolt holes thereby ending any possible future use.
BAND SAW: A large stationary power saw primarily used by most shops to cut good aluminum sheet into smaller pieces that more easily fit into the trash can after you cut on the inside of the line instead of the outside edge.
TWO-TON ENGINE HOIST: A tool for testing the maximum tensile strength of everything you forgot to disconnect.
CRAFTSMAN 1/2 x 24-INCH SCREWDRIVER: A very large pry bar that inexplicably has an accurately machined screwdriver tip on the end opposite the handle.
AVIATION METAL SNIPS: See hacksaw.
PHILLIPS SCREWDRIVER: Normally used to stab the vacuum seals under lids and for opening old-style paper-and-tin oil cans and splashing oil on your shirt; but can also be used, as the name implies, to strip out Phillips screw heads.
STRAIGHT SCREWDRIVER: A tool for opening paint cans. Sometimes used to convert common slotted screws into non-removable screws.
PRY BAR: A tool used to crumple the metal surrounding that clip or bracket you needed to remove in order to replace a 50 cent part.
HOSE CUTTER: A tool used to make hoses too short.
HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit.
MECHANIC''S KNIFE: Used to open and slice through the contents of cardboard cartons delivered to your front door; works particularly well on contents such as seats, vinyl records, liquids in plastic bottles, collector magazines, refund checks, and rubber or plastic parts. Especially useful for slicing work clothes, but only while wearing them.
DAMMIT TOOL: Any handy tool that you grab and throw across the garage while yelling ''DAMMIT'' at the top of your lungs. It is also, most often, the next tool that you will need.

Beretta Dumps Maryland After New Gun Laws

Corporate America can always vote with the jobs they have to offer.
I enjoy seeing this, not the first and will not be the last.
Beretta Dumps Maryland After New Gun Laws
Earlier today I had a thought while I was watching the news, the terrible accident in Ukraine.
Could the President issue an executive order that ban the purchase of surface to air missiles?
After all the the Russians could not be to blame, people are blameless, especially when they have more backbone than a jellyfish.

Throwing Open the Doors to Unions

The Federal government helping unions enter non-union shop with the help of OSHA.
As an engineer for a non-union plant, I've always thought OSHA treated us pretty fairly, problems only arise when disgruntled worked created problems they then reported, or disgruntled workers extending benefits through dishonest testimony. As far as the safety stuff goes the company is very involved and reaches beyond the regulations.
Bringing a union representative in on a shop inspection offers no resemblance to  being an integrated purpose visit. This is simply somebody helping somebody else get in the door.

Throwing Open the Doors to Unions

More

Four DUMB Excuses

I am on the mailing list for MoveOn and generally find their email to be simple yet spunky. 

This is a good example in the sense that it talks of the evil Hostess owners and how wrong it is for them to blame workers who make less than $20.00 per hour. Ignoring the fact that if they are making less than $20.00 per hour they probably have no business discussing the macro-economic effect of unions on private industry.  They are sheep, maybe hard working sheep, but nevertheless sheep, led down the path to unemployment by a self-serving union.
Not that it will matter to MoveOn's moronic target market, but the owners did not blame the workers, they blamed the union.  They blamed the union for demanding work rules based on the illogical purpose of increasing the work force size.  This is contrary to lean manufacturing principles and contrary to good common sense.  Market demand should be the main factor in deciding workforce size.  Market competitiveness is also the best for setting both prices of goods sold and wages paid.
Like a governement, as a business piles on unproductive costs, durability and competiveness suffer.

Four Short Sentences Explain Who Killed The Twinkie

More

Robots That Fly

This is some pretty cool stuff.  Feedback systems and interactivity remind me of my operations research studies in college.
..

More

If You Are Interested

This is the kind of buiness I am in.
Big heavy stuff.

More

50% Less Likely to Buy GM Because of Bailout

In 2006 -7 GM was rated a stock to BUY in a number of different research documents. Compared to the competing manufacturers, GM was considered an investment preferable to even those Japanese.
That all of it went to shit and I lost the whole nut.
My investment, my responsibility, my loss. No problem.
The common belief is that collapsed consumer confidence froze halted car sales, compounded by the poorly managed loan practices division were the causes that brought the giant to its sad end.
The inefficiency of union extorted pay for non-productive time is a problem that is universal to all of the unionized American manufacturers, so for the collapse I give the unions no blame. Ford, GM and Chysler all had the same for-shit supposed partner in industry.
The way the government came in and put the unions ahead of preferred creditors was an unconstitutional gifting of personal property to a union (socialist) organizations. The government acted in an extra-constitutional manner and there are nothing but faceless bureaucrats left to blame. There is no person to complain to. There is no personal or party to sue for recompense. We are left only with the power to vote out a President that has shown NO respect for the private property of those with which he is not aligned.
I do own a Chevrolet, a 1953 3600 pickup truck. A thing of beauty that smells like my grandfather's farm.
I will never, never, ever purchase a new GM vehicle.
I will never, never, ever purchase a used GM vehicle newer than a 2008 model.
When I make a commitment to boycott, it sticks, Exxon is a station I always pass.

This article speaks to me, though I am disappointed that the percentage is not much higher.

Fifty percent (50%) of American adults are less likely to buy a GM car because of the bailout. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds just four percent (4%) are more likely to buy from the company that critics refer to as Government Motors. Forty-two percent (42%) say the bailout has had no impact on their buying plans one way or the other.

50% Less Likely to Buy GM Because of Bailout

More

American Power Act

Or APA for short, brought to your by past presidential candidates Kerry and Lieberman.
Received by way of magazine, this will be posted eventually at www.paperage.com, PaperAge Managing Editor John O'Brien writes that the new Senate proposal dubbed "American Power Act" has more to do with friction than power.
Senator Kerry says this is not a 'cap and trade' bill but a pollution reduction bill.

"I don't know what 'cap and trade' means, I don't think the average American does".

I think that Senator Kerry is counting on the fact that Americans do not understand 'cap and trade', this because the underlying intent of these bills is control of carbon usage.  That means, for the most part, everything that uses energy will have to be appraised and evaluated for appropriateness and efficiency of energy use.  The government is not so much concerned with efficiency but that is the sales pitch.   Who trusts the government to have that much control in our lives. Not me.  The temptation for the government to use this tool as a means of social engineering will be too great to resist.
O'Brien writes that Climatologist Chip Knappenberger says that if the United States reaches its goal of 83% gas emission reduction, by the year 2100, global temperature will be reduced by 0.111 degree Celsius, that is same as 0.2 degrees F.  How many polar bears is that going to save.
Senator Kerry claims that APA will spur growth in the job markets by way of green energy industry expansion.  What he does not address is the number of jobs that would be lost by the increased costs of supporting the government bureaucracy, or the increased cost per family, estimated at $500 each by the year 2035.  In my appraisal the only way there will be more employment will be if every poor bastard has to work at the government compost heap. 
Let's sum it up, increased costs, less employment, vacuous promises, negligible calculable return, sounds like a liberal plan to me.

If There Is Enough Interest

Or enough profit to be had, somebody will fill the market void.  An unfortunate name, that could have been worsened only with a measurement feature named "GAYDAR".

The updated FAG Detector III is designed to record vibration with the purpose of assessing bearing condition.

In my business, industrial suppliers give away junk with the company logo.  Nobody ever wants FAG's stuff.

More

Nerd Alert

I am an engineer who works in heavy equipment repair and design. Some of the things I enjoy on the computer make engineering tasks simpler.

In my industry we often do not have the benefit of OEM drawings, yet are asked to make off the cuff analysis on modes of failure. With this program you can sketch on the fly, apply dimensions and material and viola you have stress concetations.

This is really cool Finite Element Analysis software that I hope to get approval to purchase soon.

'FEAsy' analyzes designs from raw sketches to speed parts creation

More

Yeah! That!

Being an engineer, every month there are a dozen trade magazines to scan through. The following was an unexpected gem in an otherwise boring issue. I will not add any comments because I have found a letter that speaks for me.

Evolutionary Thoughts about Revolution and Reconstitution . .an open letter to our President from an irreverent American SOB*

Written by: George Fox Lang, Associate Editor for Sound & Vibration a trade publication for vibration analysts and engineers.

These words were written on July 4, 2009. While others might have been driven to celebrate the Fourth with a fifth or with a baseball game or a cookout or an evening display of fireworks, I felt compelled to sit at my keyboard and write. I guess the independence of Independence Day strikes each of us differently. I respectfully offer these thoughts of a concerned citizen to the most recent inhabitant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20500.

Dear President Obama:
I was born in the winter of 1943, a month before General Dwight David Eisenhower was named to head the Allied armies in Europe and 18 months before he unleashed the D-Day invasion of Normandy. I was born under a flag with 48 stars; until I was in the 5th grade, we pledged allegiance to it without the words, “under God.” America was engaged in a world war on two fronts, and the outcome was anything but certain. The President of the United States was wheelchair bound and serving his third term. He would die in the first year of his fourth term, and radio would bring the quavering voice of Arthur Godfrey into every living room with the proud but profoundly saddening details of his state funeral. The nation buried its elected parent, dried its eyes and successfully completed the necessary but repugnant tasks of war. That included ushering in the Atomic Age.

The United States of America was born in war and later nearly torn apart by it. The need for Civil War materials fostered early manufacturing genius and moved us toward our modern Iron Age. World War I literally transformed us from an agrarian society to an industrialized one. It was purely the American ability to conceive, create and produce that allowed us to survive and eventually dominate in the Second World War. Had we not been able to out-manufacture the enemy, the English language might now be extinct. But we did out-manufacture them; we mixed domestic knowledge with patriotic dedication to convert our rich natural resources to needed radar, radios, ships, planes, guns, bombs and food. And in that time of world crisis, we somehow managed to put selfish personal goals aside and work toward the betterment of mankind.

In the aftermath of WWII, America did something unprecedented in world history: we rebuilt our vanquished foes. It was the right and humane thing to do, a thing of which all citizens of this nation can and should be justly proud. We showed confidence in our democratic form and in our commercial processes as well as in the innate goodness of man. What we did wasn’t a Christian thing or a Jewish thing or even a religious thing; it wasn’t a black, white, brown or yellow thing; it was simply a uniquely American thing, a very auspicious opening to the brief American Age of the 20th Century.

I consider myself very fortunate to have been born an American citizen, more so to have lived through the American Age. I was here when the iron lung was rendered obsolete by gamma globulin and then the Salk vaccine. I was here when the “sound barrier” was broken and saw a man walk on the moon’s surface. My home saw almost continuous improvements in comfort: cheap and reliable electricity from nuclear power, affordable air conditioning, water based paint and aluminum siding, black and-white and then color television, push button phones and answering machines, microwave ovens, FM radio and then stereo sound systems with long-playing record albums and reel-to-reel tape followed by cassettes and then compact discs.

I enjoyed every step of the electronic revolution, from hard tubes to transistors to chips, and was here when the microprocessor beget the personal computer. In short, I have enjoyed a comfortable and exciting existence made possible by American technology, American ingenuity, American industry and American integrity. However, I fear I now live in the rapidly descending dusk of the American Age and have no clear vision of what the future may hold.

Can we hold off this impending darkness? I don’t know, but I have some suggestions that might be worth exploring. Is such exploration necessary? I fear that it is. These are not simple evolutionary notions; they are quite revolutionary, perhaps even heretical. For much of the American Age, we lived in competition with (and often in fear of) the “great red bear,” the USSR. But that adversary has essentially vanished, the victim of economic “implosion.” But exactly what really killed the bear and is it now stalking us? In my (never humble) opinion, the answers to those questions are: greed and yes.

I submit to you that there is nothing inherently evil about a communist society. As with our democracy, the “evil” comes in the implementation and the doing, not in the underlying philosophy. In fact, for a population starving in a hostile place, the communist notion of “let’s all work together for the common good” makes perfect sense; one might even call it a democratic notion. I have always been astounded that our nation’s founding documents didn’t contain more of this thought pattern. But then, my nation was founded by an eclectic mix of “break-aways” and “cast-offs” from an evolved western European society. We came to these shores as a collection of both leaders and followers, not merely a disenfranchised dissident horde. It is this societal difference that gave rise to the splendid nature of our founding documents.

While Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto may be a great read from a great mind, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States are nearly poetic statements of hard-won human accord on matters of utmost human importance hammered out between brilliant men mutually facing a very difficult circumstance.

I review this not to say that good has triumphed over evil, but rather to point out that “there but for fortune, go I.” The USSR vanished not to our expectation, but to our shock and surprise. We would be fools not to accept that a similar fate could await the United States. Marx’s Manifesto prescribed need for a ruling presidium. It also prescribed the eventual need for that prestigious group to step down and join the proletariat masses. That transition never happened; the idealistic notion that men in power are willing to set that power aside and join their fellow citizens as equals requires that those rulers be very special people. The USSR didn’t have them, and we don’t either. This beloved experiment we know as America may actually be drawn down to ashes and ruin by those people we respectfully call senator and representative.

The simple fact of the matter is that we endure far too much government to pretend we are a free people. Every U.S. citizen is governed by nearly Avogadro’s number (6.02 x 10^23) of laws when we consider the ever-growing confusing morass of local, state and federal rulings. The last thing we need are more laws and thus, more law-makers. What we badly need are empowered representatives willing to remove existing laws at every level.

But we have a Congress full of lawyers, people who know how to do little but debate, posture and conjure up further constraints upon our freedoms. The national asylum is now run by Harvard Law School (and its less influential competitors); if our nation is to survive, we must find a way to change this.

Before the asylum’s inmates decide to rise to anarchy, perhaps Congress might recognize it has a chance to avert national (and personal) disaster. The time has come for fewer legislators at every level. It is no longer acceptable for anyone to make a career out of elected service; no one should serve more than one term in any federal elective office. There is no longer a need for special retirement programs (or bomb hardened bunkers under luxury resorts) for the Congress of the United States. It is time for them to stand down with the American proletariat and be limited to the same benefits accorded to all other citizens (and nothing more). Congress could make these changes law in an afternoon. I submit it would be well advised to do so rather than standing like a chest-puffed presidium. Let our “best” lawyers prove to be good history students in the final analysis.

I hold our Constitution, particularly the early components from Preamble through the seven Articles to Amendment 10, in the highest personal esteem. This was a document of steel-like strength, forged in fire fueled with courage. It was beautifully written by a collection of brave and intellectual men, the likes of whom may never again assemble. Our Constitution as originally enacted was a masterpiece of forward thinking written in clear and insightful prose. Our founders left nothing to be interpreted in what they wrote. They defined the rights of free men in clear and unambiguous language. They explained in those few statements what they collectively were willing to die for; what they personally refused to live without.

I only wish they had added an 11th Amendment to the Bill of Rights, something to the effect:

We have deliberately provided for the evolutionary growth of this document through a defined process of amendment. However, being unable to predict or control the future, while understanding the selfish nature of man, we recognize that the system of law that will rise from this Constitution may eventually become corrupt, deviating from our avowed intentions. For this reason, on every tenth anniversary of this signing, all federal laws including any Amendments added to this Constitution, shall become null and void, and the United States will revert to the strict guidance of this Constitution as it was originally ratified in 1788, amended only by the original Bill of Rights ratified on December 15, 1791. It will be the obligation of the Congress to re-institute such additional laws as it then deems necessary using the processes prescribed herein.

Yes, Mr. President, I fully understand such a Constitutional “do-over” is an unattainable pipe dream. But while I indulge in sucking upon the opiates of my own mind and reveling in the possibilities of a perpetuated American Age, let me share with you some thoughts of what might actually make such perpetuation a possibility.

The American Age was brought about by our nation’s ability to create and manufacture, not by its ability to borrow or loan. When $10^12 leaves the U.S. Treasury to bolster banks and other financial institutions institutions, while our largest manufacturers are told to “suck it up” without federal assistance, I feel my President needs to review American history.

During your first address to our Congress, you discussed the economic recovery of our nation. I listened to you for more than an hour and never once heard you utter the very critical word – manufacturing. It is my fear that you (and the “bobble-heads” who danced behind you) completely missed what happened in the U.S. between 1941 and the present. If we are to survive this economic recession, if we are to thrive again, American manufacturing needs to flourish – not American banking, not our middlemen nor our brokers. If the government is to aid our economy, it needs to stimulate the nation’s producers, not simply appease its greatest sources of economic entropy. It is the inventors, entrepreneurs, manufacturers, farmers, teachers and physicians of this nation who are our potential salvation. Give them the
help that they need to do what we need, rather than shoring up the posturing
egomaniacs who have brought us to this brink of Armageddon.

There are currently 435 highly overpaid and over-rewarded people “serving” in the House of Representatives; 162 of them are lawyers. Like most citizens, I would be very hard pressed to find a single person among them who actually represents me, my thoughts, my philosophies, my views or my needs in any way. Of our 100 Senators, 54 are lawyers. In this voter’s view, we could do with far fewer congressmen, and I’d love to see the 40% barrister content of Congress seriously reduced. As a matter of compromise, I might learn to live with the notion that the Senate must be fully populated with lawyers, but only if I could be assured that the House of Representatives would be entirely free of them.

What we sorely need are people in Congress who understand the possible solution of our nation’s problems from their own firsthand experience, successes and failures. If we are going to solve problems of energy production, we need to populate the Congress with experienced and competent engineers and scientists. If we really want to deliver quality medical care to the nation, we need to have more than a titular sampling of physicians and nurses in our legislative branch. Education will not be improved by 535 lawyers chanting “no child left behind” in unison. It will require dedicated professional educators in Congress making tough decisions for our children intelligently and compassionately. In short, Congress must rapidly reconstitute itself to factually represent the people of America and their needs. What we must have in Congress are concerned and educated citizens serving diligently to resolve the nation’s many woes, not a league of “professional representative” dilettantes intent upon selfishly preserving their own elevated standard of living.

I am a former employee of General Motors Corporation and recently watched the value of that company’s stock evaporate and then re-condense as the property of the U.S. Government and the UAW. As a 30-odd-year owner of that stock, this offends. I saw the chairman of GM berated by the Senate, probably by men whose election the company had largely funded. This whole issue of the U.S. Government versus American automotive manufacturers has left a very bad taste in my mouth. In my opinion, the President of the United States must refrain from trying to run any commercial business. Even giving the appearance of directing such enterprises is most inappropriate to the office and offensive to the average citizen.

If you must muck with an American industry, why not choose to disable, dismember and dissolve an outmoded albatross that is systematically destroying our nation by crushing its economy? In this voter’s view, it is time to declare that no American citizen be forced to bet against himself; it is time to outlaw all forms of insurance and reform tort law. We have become nationally conditioned to the notion of buying “protection” against every malady that might befall us, including death. Indeed, the law requires us to insure our cars, and banks force us to insure the titles of our homes. Tort-driven court settlements force every manufacturer and service provider to insure against liability lawsuits, real or frivolous.

When I file my income tax returns, insurance is invariably my second-highest cost of human existence, overshadowed only by those taxes. Insurance has escalated civil court judgments to unreasonable dollar levels and given rise to a civil law industry that screams to be extinguished. This in turn forces us to insure every aspect of our lives against our fellow man. Malpractice insurance is every physician’s highest cost of doing business. The insurance industry now dictates what care a doctor may deliver to his patient, and its accountants control the scope of hospital facilities made
available to us. Insurance is directly responsible for more expensive automobiles and the elevated cost of all domestic goods. Tort law and insurance squeeze the life out of a free economy.

The President of the United States must often walk a fine line between multiple opposing philosophies. Ultimately, the man in your office always serves us best when he follows the very personal dictates of his own mind, heart and soul. Three hundred million of us trust our President to do just that. A very few us, this arrogant writer included, have the audacity to suggest a few dark corners of that soul that must be investigated and challenged before sleeping peacefully in our White House. I hope that I have illuminated those corners for your consideration candidly, clearly and respectfully.

With my fervent best wishes for your success and the survival of our wounded nation.

George Fox Lang

Machining Is Cool

Since I work as an engineer for a machine shop and on a daily basis see how this can be applied.I think this is realy cool.

Very nerd-like I know.

If you could put a hundred ton part in that holding fixture, my job would be a lot easier.

William Otis

Long time ago, 170 years to the day, another Otis named William did something noteworthy.....

On this day in 1839, William Otis got the first a patent for the steam shovel. Before that time there were cranes and other leverage devices used for lifting but the steam power permitted the application of focused power. Focus of mechanical power creates efficiencies. The use of these mechanized engines are evident all over the world in mammoth public works such as dams, bridges and canals.

William Otis described his invention as "the Crane-dredge for excavation and earth removals".

Ever see the name Otis on an elevator or escalator? We have those at the courtesy of William's cousin Elishu Otis.

Perhaps the new government could develop a parallel to the steam shovel, that for moving wealth to consumption (waste) more efficiently.