The ratio of cases to individuals is roughly 1:4.
The percentage Muslims in the current total of 2,671 individuals placed in the United States is 98%.

Sourced from Refugee Resettlement Watch.
A vote against stopping the discussion on how to share, of all thing, the sharing of revenue from wind. For me, the mind is drafting to Don Quixote, tilting at windmills, because this Congressional content is about as relevant as a fart in church.Recent House Votes:
The House Republicans are cuing up the latest Executive orders for repeal. The vote by my pipsqueak Democratic Congressman is hardly surprising.Iranian Aircraft Purchases Vote Passed (243-174, 17 Not Voting)
The House of Representatives wants to make it as difficult as possible for the Iranians to purchase commercial aircraft. David Scott voted against that precaution. In thinking about the application of the vote, it may be that he is trying to protect local industry. But I doubt it.
I am more interested in what is to come. A government where Democrats and Republicans alike are inclined toward increasing government. Soon the Republicans will have complete control of all but the SCOTUS. Will they keep their promises to ditch ACA? I sincerely doubt it.
This pretty much always passes because this is where most of the spending directed at industry is applied. The only time that one or the other party objects is when there is some competing spending stream that has gathered steam.
Votes about talking, boring.
Votes about agreement, boring.Water Infrastructure Conference Report Vote Agreed to (69-30, 1 Not Voting)
Why is the Federal government working to solve problems that the state government has created. Let California succeed, future political seasons will be much more exciting.
Votes about reports, boring.Recent House Votes
David Scott voted against a proposal that bars the executive from making "treaties" without Congressional oversight. This I know is not a technically accurate comment, but in general, I am against any unchecked agreement with global standards.
Voting to continue deficit spending, infuriating.Water Infrastructure Conference Report Vote Passed (360-61, 12 Not Voting)
Votes to spend money on problems that were already paid for to be corrected. Not the Fed's fault I know, but municipalities like Flint and New Orleans are famous for spending money intended for "infastructure" on parks and useless shit like that.MegaVote is powered by the CQ-Roll Call Group
It is curious to see a government need to have a vote on a work practice. Sadly, it must be evidence that existing rules prevent dynamic change in government and more importantly the business that the y have under their thumb. This was so simple that the Senators were able to be unanimous in approval. More impressive would be another unanimous vote by Congress to get the heck out of the way of comon sense.
Fast tracking medicine approvals. Again , this is government, trying to simplify the mess that government created.
If I understand correctly, my Congressman just voted not to approve of money budget that is already spent. Good thing that the Republicans set the vote correctly, otherwise all that money spent trying to prove something the press already exposed might have been wasted.
My Congressman probably gets large campaign donations from banking institutions. Generally I am for less supervision of any business by government, for banking the same. The problem is that where the regulations originate is usually i the industry, that means some poor bank startup has no influence over the rules created. Rules that certainly favor the players that are established, and can lead to quasi-monopolistic marketplace.
David Scott has been alright with me in terms of defense postures.Upcoming Votes
The new President has promised to make the Detroit situation right, but things like water projects are never resolved quickly and always costs multiples of the amounts estimated.
Government has been largely responsible for restricting insurance competition i the United States and that alone is significant to the spiraling cost of health care. The EU models seems to work pretty well on a basic level if you are willing to overlook the lack of service availability issues that arise when doctors and nurses spurn the marketplace. Government involved in insurance, other than fraud, is bad.
Who thinks we will achieve an approved budget in the next two years, not me.
We know what the future is, it's the past that keeps changing.
Drunk, Naked Guy Searching For Sex Partner Instead Ends Up Behind Bars:Joshua Ivy, eager to for some sex, got undressed in the parking lot and started banging on doors.
Muhammad Was A FeministA statement, as title of the article, that is contrary to the portrayals seen in western media. When I read such a statement, my first presumption is that author is attempting to draw the reader in with a statement of political incorrectness. Breitbart describes the conceptual statement as "legerdemain" which I had to look up and is a noun defined as...
Excerpts from Banafsheh Sayyad's article follow with commentspronounced: lejərdəˈmāndefined: skillful use of one's hands when performing conjuring tricks.synonyms: sleight of hand, conjuring, magic, wizardry, deception, trickery, cunning, artfulness, craftiness, chicanery, skulduggery, deceit, deception, artifice
The prophet Muhammad would be appalled by how current Islamic Fundamentalists are treating women under their control. This suppression is done in the name of Islamic Law, known as Sharia. But the current suppression of women is shaped by cultural and history. It has little basis in the Quran and it is certainly not consistent with anything we know about what Muhammad taught or how he treated women. Of all the founders of the great religions - Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism, Islam and Judaism — Muhammad was easily the most radical and empowering in his treatment of women. Arguably he was history’s first feminist.An opening salvo, declarative statement that will be supported by equally obsurd examples.
This is of critical importance because if there is one single thing that Arabs and Muslims could do to reform and re-vitalize their crisis ridden cultures, it would be to liberate their women and provide them with the full rights women are enjoying in more and more countries around the world. Women’s equality is key to a real Arab Spring.There is certainly more than one thing that can be done, but as a statement of the need for eqaulity of Islamic womento Islamic men, fine.
Among the founders of the great religions, Confucius barely mentioned women at all and assumed in all his teachings that they we subordinate to men within a patriarchal order. Buddha taught that women could become enlightened but had to be pressured three times before allowing women to become nuns, and then only on the condition, as he put it, that the highest nun would be lower than the lowest monk. In the Gospel accounts, Jesus did not explicitly comment on the status of women, although he did associate with women of ill repute and with non Jewish women. Moses was thoroughly patriarchal and there is virtually nothing in the Torah that indicates specific concern about women’s rights.Is this an argument that the absence of statements by religious icons is proof of a discriminatory prediliction? In all cases these writings are transcriptions of what the leaders had said, thereby imbibed with the writing styles and cultures of that time.
Muhammad was fundamentally different. He both explicitly taught the radical equality of women and men as a fundamental tenet of true spirituality, and he took numerous concrete measures to profoundly improve the status and role of women in Arabia during his own lifetime. Muhammad was sensitized to the plight of women because he was born poor and orphaned at a very early age. He was also illiterate. He knew as few did what poverty and social exclusion meant.Please give us examples this teaching of of the concept of equality. This is a statement of fact without support.
Confucius was born into the gentry scholar class of ancient China. Buddha was born a wealthy prince in Nepal. Jesus was born the son of a carpenter with royal lineage and within a tightly knit Jewish community in Palestine. Moses was born into a Hebrew family and raised in the palace of the Pharaoh of Egypt. Muhammad had none of these advantages. Thus while other religious leaders seemed strangely silent about the oppression of women, Muhammad dramatically raised the status of women as a matter of religious conviction and state policy. Consider the following:The lineage of Confucius, I cannot speak for, but the Moses was a slave, and Jesus lived in a conquered country ruled by Rome.
During seventh century Arabia, female infanticide was commonplace. Muhammad abolished it. A saying in the Hadith (the collection of sayings of Muhammad) records that Muhammad said that the birth of a girl was a “blessing.” Women in Arabia at that time were essentially considered property and had absolutely no civil rights. Muhammad gave them the right to own property and they were extended very important marital and inheritance rights.Taken at face value, a fine act of reformation. Today, 13 centuries later, Muslims still treat women in the same Bedouin manner, women are chattel. So while the infanticide may have been stopped, the basic culture which practices female subjugation has continued.
Prior to Muhammad, the dowry paid by a man for his bride was given to her father as part of the contract between the two men. Women had no say in the matter. Muhammad declared that women needed to assent to the marriage and that the dowry should go to the bride, not the father; furthermore, she could keep the dowry even after marriage. The wife did not have to use the dowry for family expenses. That was the responsibility of the man. Women were also given the right to divorce their husbands, something unprecedented at that time. In a divorce, the woman was empowered to take the dowry with her.There is a large a gap between what the prophet has instructed and what the behavior is.
Women were extended inheritance rights as well. They were only given half as much as their brothers because the men had more financial responsibilities for family expenses, but with Muhammad, women became inheritors of property and family assets for the first time in Arabia. At the time, this was considered revolutionary.There is a large a gap between what the prophet has instructed and what the behavior is.
Muhammad himself was often seen doing “women’s work” around the house and was very attentive to his family. His first marriage to Khadija was monogamous for the entire 15 years they were married, something rare in Arabia at that time. By all accounts, they were deeply in love and Khadija in fact was the first convert to Islam. She encouraged Muhammad from his very first encounter with the angel Gabriel and the recitation of the first suras that were to become the Quran.This is not unlike similar instances in the Bible.
After Khadija’s death, Muhammad married 12 wives. One was Aisha, the daughter of his closest friend and ally Abu Baker. The rest were nearly all widows, divorced women, or captives. He preached consistently that it was the responsibility of men to protect those women who had met with misfortune. This was one of the reasons polygamy was encouraged. Even with female infanticide, women in seventh century Arabia far outnumbered men because so many men were killed in the inter-tribal warfare of the day. Several of Muhammad’s wives were poor and destitute and he took them in, along with their children, into his household.As a grown man of over 50 years old, Muhammad married a six year old girl. The feminist in him kept him from consummating until she was nine years old.
In his Farewell Sermon delivered shortly before he died in 632, Muhammad said to the men, “You have certain rights over women but they have certain rights over you.” Women, he said, are your “partners and helpers.” In one of the sayings of the Hadith, Muhammad says, “The best men are those who are best to their wives.”Again, there is a large a gap between what the prophet has instructed and what the behavior is.
His wife Aisha took a leadership role after his death in bringing together the Hadith and another wife played a leading role in gathering together the suras that comprise the Quran. Each of the 114 suras that comprise the Quran with the exception of sura 9 begin with the words Bismillah al Rahman al Rahim. Translated most commonly as “In the Name of God, all compassionate, all merciful,” the deeper meaning of this phrase is “In the Name of the One who births compassion and mercy from the womb.” This invocation of the feminine aspect of Allah is key to an Islamic Renaissance.What happened after the prophets death has no bearing on who he was as a man. Sorry, this statement carries no weight at all.
Finally, there is nothing in the Quran about women wearing the veil, the Hejab. That was certainly the custom in Arabia at that time and Muhammad’s wives wore the Hejab to designate their special status as “Mothers of the Believers,” but the only thing the Quran says directly is that women should dress “modestly.” Muhammad said the same thing to men. For him, modesty of dress was expressive of modesty of the heart. Muhammad himself, even when he was supreme leader, never wore anything more than simple white woolen attire.And yet, burkas are required attire for many Islamic women. It can be granted that, excluding the royals, and the burkas, that man and women both dress in a manner that is both similar and modest.
So radical were Muhammad’s reforms that the status of women in Arabia and early Islam was higher than any other society in the world at that time. Women in 7th century Arabia had rights not extended to most women in the West till recent centuries over 1,000 years later. The fact that women have ended up in such a degraded position in many contemporary Arab/Muslim counties is a tragedy and needs to be rectified if the Islamic culture and civilization is to flourish again as it did during the Abbasid Caliphate from the 8th - 13th centuries when Islamic civilization was a shining light to the world. Liberating women would have profound effects politically, economically, culturally, artistically, and religiously. It would take the Arab Spring to a whole new level, which is what is so desperately needed in those countries that suffered the first Arab Spring as a stillbirth.The teachings did not become part of the culture, sure to describe as a reform would be at best, premature.
It is time for Islam to liberate women fully and do so upon the example of Muhammad and the authority of the Quran that holds compassion and mercy as the first and foremost attributes of Allah.Agreed.
The bill appropriates $3.5 billion Legislative Branch bill for fiscal 2017, which covers the operations of the House, the Capitol Police, Architect of the Capitol, Library of Congress and other agencies. The measure is expected to be the vehicle for the continuing resolution that would deal with broader veterans funding and emergency money needed to fight the spread of the Zika virus. Sixty votes were needed to invoke cloture.
The joint resolution prohibits a roughly $1 billion sale of military equipment to Saudi Arabia, including well more than a hundred Abrams tanks.
The bill postpones, until all legal challenges are completed, the implementation of any new federal rule that would have an economic impact of $1 billion or more per year.
The bill requires the Treasury secretary to compile and submit to Congress a report detailing the known assets of Iran's top political and military leaders, how those assets were acquired and for what purposes the assets were used.
The bill allows employee stockholders in certain startup businesses to defer income taxes on stock options for up to seven years, when they are more likely to have the funds to make the tax payments.
The bill specifies that it is the policy of the U.S. government not to pay ransom or release prisoners for the purpose of securing the release of U.S. citizens taken hostage abroad, and it generally prohibits the U.S. government from providing to the government of Iran, either directly or indirectly, any cash or other promissory note. It requires the administration to obtain a Treasury foreign assets license before settling any pending financial claims with Iran, and to publicly disclose each such transaction and payment.
The bill would appropriate $3.5 billion Legislative Branch bill for fiscal 2017, which covers the operations of the House, the Capitol Police, Architect of the Capitol, Library of Congress and other agencies. The measure is expected to be the vehicle for the continuing resolution that would deal with broader veterans funding and emergency money needed to fight the spread of the Zika virus.
The measure would permit possible lawsuits by U.S. victims of international terrorism against foreign nationals, which could allow the families of 9/11 victims to sue certain Saudi citizens, including members of the royal family. The bill was vetoed by President Barack Obama on September 23, 2016.
The bill would authorize 27 new water projects for construction by the Army Corps of Engineers and would authorizes the corps to conduct feasibility studies for 29 possible projects. It also would deauthorize five existing projects and would establish an expedited process for the deauthorization of other projects that are no longer viable, and it would modify the water project selection process created by the 2014 authorization law and other elements of that law in order to clarify and strengthen its application and use.
The bill would appropriate $3.5 billion Legislative Branch bill for fiscal 2017, which covers the operations of the House, the Capitol Police, Architect of the Capitol, Library of Congress and other agencies. The measure is expected to be the vehicle for the continuing resolution that would deal with broader veterans funding and emergency money needed to fight the spread of the Zika virus.
Motion to invoke cloture (thus limiting debate) on the bill which authorizes $10.6 billion in funding for more than 30 Army Corps of Engineers water infrastructure projects under the current law (PL 113-121), including waterways and flood control systems, as well as Environmental Protection Agency drinking water infrastructure programs. The measure authorizes $220 million in recovery assistance, specifically $100 million for water infrastructure improvements available to "states with emergency drinking water situations" via state revolving fund loans; $70 million in Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act credit subsidies; and $50 million in health screening and education grants. Sixty votes are needed to invoke cloture.Sen. Johnny Isakson voted YES
The Senate passed legislation which authorizes $10.6 billion in funding for more than 30 Army Corps of Engineers water infrastructure projects under the current law (PL 113-121), including waterways and flood control systems, as well as Environmental Protection Agency drinking water infrastructure programs. The measure also authorizes $220 million in recovery assistance, specifically $100 million for water infrastructure improvements available to "states with emergency drinking water situations" via state revolving fund loans; $70 million in Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act credit subsidies; and $50 million in health screening and education grants.Sen. Johnny Isakson voted YES
The legislation repeals the increases in the threshold at which individuals may begin deducting unreimbursed medical expenses from their income as set by the 2010 health care law, thereby rolling the threshold back to 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income for all taxpayers and preventing the threshold from increasing to 10 percent for senior citizens. Under the measure, the medical deduction threshold reverts to 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income beginning with the current 2016 tax year.Rep. David Scott voted Not Voting
The legislation requires each federal agency to maintain an online searchable list of its regulatory actions and all public communications it makes regarding those regulatory actions. It also prohibits agencies from soliciting support for, or promoting, its regulatory actions.Rep. David Scott voted YES
The bill expands the ability of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Department to fire or demote VA employees based on performance or misconduct, and it overhauls the VA's current disability appeals process by giving veterans the choice of three "lanes" for appeal when dissatisfied with an initial VA benefits decision. It also includes provisions to protect VA whistleblowers against retaliation by supervisors, authorizes the VA to recoup employee bonuses and relocation expenses, allows the VA to reduce Senior Executive Service (SES) employees' pensions upon conviction of certain felonies, streamlines disciplinary actions for SES employees and eliminates all bonuses for SES employees for five years.Rep. David Scott voted YES
The measure prohibits the Defense Department from transferring or releasing any detainee from the detention facility at the U.S. Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, into the United States, its territories or possessions, or to any foreign country or entity. The blanket prohibition would end on Jan. 21, 2017, or earlier once a Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 2017 is enacted.Rep. David Scott voted YES
The bill would appropriate $3.5 billion Legislative Branch bill for fiscal 2017, which covers the operations of the House, the Capitol Police, Architect of the Capitol, Library of Congress and other agencies. The current bill text is expected to be replaced with text containing the continuing resolution that would deal with broader veterans funding and emergency money needed to fight the spread of the Zika virus.Zika?
The joint resolution would prohibit a roughly $1 billion sale of military equipment to Saudi Arabia, including well more than a hundred Abrams tanks.The tanks aren't the problem with Saudi Arabia, its the duplicitous sheiks who run the country. They do business with the United States, all the time fomenting religious warfare.
The bill would postpone, until all legal challenges are completed, the implementation of any new federal rule that would have an economic impact of $1 billion or more per year.This would be ignored, or at least skirted, all it would take is an intentional misstatement of the expect financial impact. Remember, these people are liars and the want nothing more than to run everything.
The bill would require the Treasury secretary to compile and submit to Congress a report detailing the known assets of Iran's top political and military leaders, how those assets were acquired and for what purposes the assets were used.I think a better list to keep, would be, one which lists all Iranians donating money to political candidates and organizations in the United States.
The bill would allow employee stockholders in certain startup businesses to defer income taxes on stock options for up to seven years, when they are more likely to have the funds to make the tax payments.The IRS has been playing a little bit dirty on this topic, making some taxpayers pay taxes on unrealized profits.
The bill would specify that it is the policy of the U.S. government not to pay ransom or release prisoners for the purpose of securing the release of U.S. citizens taken hostage abroad, and it generally would prohibit the U.S. government from providing to the government of Iran, either directly or indirectly, any cash or other promissory note. It would require the administration to obtain a Treasury foreign assets license before settling any pending financial claims with Iran, and to publicly disclose each such transaction and payment.There were already laws non the books that the President and his minions ignores when making the last transfer to Iran. Who thinks that a motivated politicians is going to be limited by some silly law such as this? Not me.